What would you say is the main thing I'm missing out on by not going for the Standard edition now ? Thank you very much for your feedback, by the way :) you get to select and configure everything as you want. Truepianos have it, but has an really annoying AI way of presuming what I wan't, where as Pianoteq installer is a dream. Arturia is off the list, minimum requirement is XP compatibility and 32-bit functionality. but to me this sounds more like minor stuff as long as I like the sound I have. Is there any major reason to go for the Standard edition ? I see I will be missing Piano model tweaking. I'm very satisfied so far with the playability I get with this. thinking of starting with the Stage and the Steinway bundle. I'm leaning most towards Pianoteq of all those. Anyway, best to buy Standard instead of Stage. But you can start with Steinway bundle too, if you prefer. Incredibly detailed, wonderfully playable and choices galore. TruePianos, Pianoteq and the one from Arturia I'd opt for Pianoteq all the way.
Sven I forgot to mention, it's preferable if it's usable in Win XP as well as have a 32-bit VST option.įleer Essentially, you've got three choices. I was hoping for some feedback on this before I decide, I see there are other options as well. Truepianos, seem a bit more crude and simple in this way. I like it's wizard for adapting itself to the nature of your existing keyboards bed. though PianoTeq seems somewhat more complex and sophisticated. What I'm wondering about is, which of these is the smartest choice ? I like both of them. the latter which maybe will give a better piano feel to the playing. other than that I will be using it with other light Roland Keybeds.
I will mainly be using it with my Roland A-500, but have ambitions of at some point in the future to get a real hammer action type of keyboard (recommendations appreciated). The choice I'm considering at the moment is whether to go for TruePianos, which comes with a SPlat discount. I'm in the process of buying a Virtual Piano.